It’s All Connected, IV

After the unpleasant Tuesday I described in yesterday’s post, I wasn’t sure if Wednesday would be better … or worse.  Initial signs were promising: the weather was more stable, I had slept well, I saw the moon, huge and orange as a result of the “scheduled” lunar eclipse, and I managed to avoid speaking to Ms. X in the faculty workroom Wednesday morning – all positive signs.  But the schedule was altered – advisory groups were meeting, and many of my colleagues expected bitter whining and complaints from students adversely affected by a new school-district policy.  Sometimes different daily rhythms throw off the delicate balance.  And if anyone is upset about something outside the classroom (like D, who’d gotten in trouble before his Latin class on Monday), it’s hard for that not to affect what happens in the classroom.

But Wednesday was a wonderful day!   We were productive and peaceful, and there was a real feeling of positive energy in the room most of the day.  As I sat down to reflect on Tuesday afternoon, I wondered how I had contributed to the resistance and negative energy I’d been feeling.  By attempting to control the pace in my classes – because students had been struggling with self-paced activities – had I swung the pendulum too far in the other direction?  Had we fallen into something like a pain-punishment cycle – or a self-fulfilling expectation cycle?  I wasn’t sure, but I wanted to find out.  So I designed a much more self-directed, self-paced set of classes for Wednesday … and made sure to explain why to each class.

Instead of a single-correct-response, application or analysis-level starting activity, the Latin I students formed small groups and created sentences (“intriguing or silly,” the instructions read) from a word bank.  We’ve been reading the stories in Lectiō X of the Tres Columnae Project, which feature idiomatic uses of the verbs trādere and reddere.  So all the sentence possibilities involved people starting, dramatically, to do things (lacrimīs sē trādit) or things causing people to feel or be a certain way (dominum īrātissimum reddit). After making four or five sentences, each group chose their best or most intriguing sentence and illustrated it with “the best possible stick figures.”  We used the document camera to display the illustrations, then attempted to guess each other’s sentences.

Then, instead of a whole-class, controlled-pace reading activity, small groups worked at their own pace to read two stories about our animal characters (this one about Fortunata the cow and this one about one of the weasels).  “Listen to the audio clips,” I said, “if that helps you, but definitely practice saying and understanding the stories.”  I reminded them that, as Novice Mid to Novice High readers of Latin, they shouldn’t expect to “know” every word.  Main idea, I stressed, plus many familiar words and phrases.  Based on the words and phrases they did understand, each group created at least one Latin question (and its answer) for the sixteen virtual “pages” of stories.  After 25 minutes or so, we played a game we call Quaestiōnēs Mittite, where the written questions circulate from one group to another, each group choosing two questions to answer – or to edit and rewrite if the  original question seemed unclear or ungrammatical.

Results?  Instead of forced, difficult engagement, we had genuine, sustained engagement … especially in the reading and question-writing activities.  We’ll do something similar today, at the beginning of each class, before we spend most of the day creating our own original stories.

Later in the day, I followed a link a friend had sent me to Cindy Gaddis’s blog about “open-ended, individualized learning.”  Cindy lays out four essential traits that distinguish real, authentic learning from the “closed-ended, standardized learning” that factory-model schools are built to deliver.  As I read, I realized how I’d contributed to the negative energy I described the other day.  In my attempts to control the pace, to help my students focus, to ease some of their difficulties, I had ironically reproduced some of the factory-model conditions they – and I – dislike.

Inspired by what Cindy says about homeschooling her own seven children, I started this Google+ thread, where Debbie immediately noted that Cindy’s approach is “preschool expanded” and Rachel wished her own son could experience such a learning environment.  I’d been reading more of Sal Khan’s new book, too, the part where he talks about small amounts of self-paced learning, large amounts of passion- and interest-based project work, teachers as facilitating guides, and multi-age groups where the older learners can take real responsibility for the younger ones.  (It’s amazing, isn’t it, how these ideas are everywhere all of a sudden?)   And over on Google+, the rich conversation about rules and policiies and identity continued … and continued to inspire and challenge me.

What made the difference, I wonder?  What led me to see the problem and take these steps instead of the “more of the same, but faster” factory approach I’d started to fall into?

Was it the G+ conversations?  Or something else I’d heard or read?

Was it that I was more relaxed and better-rested?  Did that help me set a more positive emotional tone?

Was it the assignments themselves?  I set out to make them more challenging and complex, but less lengthy and difficult.  Maybe that led to a better balance.

Was it N, N, and N? They’re often the most negative, angry people in the Latin I classes, and they all happened to be absent.  Was it as simple as that?

It’s hard – so hard, but so necessary – to build and sustain joyful learning community in the midst of a rapid, frantic teaching factory.  It’s easy – so easy, but so destructive – to fall into the factory habits.  The phrase “in but not of” comes to mind, and it speaks to me profoundly – but how do we maintain that balance?

Published in: on November 29, 2012 at 11:19 am  Comments (5)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. I’m SO excited to read your classroom experiences as you figure out how you can be the most effective facilitator of learning! We homeschoolers can be accused of abandoning the system that needs us, and I understand where that sentiment comes from. What I wanted to do was to give back to the system knowledge that I learned from my years of homeschooling on an individualized level. It’s the whole reason I wrote my book and created my website.

    Some of the things I loved about your post are:

    1. That you’re looking at yourself first and how you contribute to the learning environment. Let me tell you, the changes I made in myself were huge to get to the learning environment I wanted most for my children.

    2. That you recognize that your students don’t like or do well in a standardized model of learning, and that you agree as the teacher.

    3. That you compared what I wrote to an “extended preschool.” When I told my oldest son about it, he mentioned a comedian did a set where he said something like, “Ah, I remember my preschool days fondly. It got me all excited about going to kindergarten. And when I went, I thought, hey, what’s going on here? Then I realized preschool was a trick. They got me excited that learning was fun and they tricked me into wanting to go to school.” He thinks it was Demetri Martin.

    I think the matured version of “fun learning” is what you described as genuine sustained engagement. That translates to a love of learning, I think.

    Again, thanks for letting me/others know that my experiences can help those in school. It’s something I’m really passionate about right now and would love to know how I can continue to support you and other teachers who want to bring in real, authentic learning. I would love to be part of the conversation about how to continue this balance you’re looking for!

    • Cindy, I’m so glad you liked this post so much! Yours resonated deeply with me, too. I’m looking forward to continuing the conversation.

  2. Thought you might benefit from this post as you work to be more individualized oriented and project-based in your classroom:

    • Thanks so much, Cindy! I read Lisa’s blog fairly regularly but had not yet seen that post.

      It’s amazing how the conversations about education are changing!

  3. […] and B were assigned to in-school suspension last Thursday.  When the email notice came, it included a sad little paragraph: “Please do not tell N. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: